<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>fugaz &#187; Semantic web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fugaz.net/tag/semantic-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fugaz.net</link>
	<description>stateless version</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Semantic web, Google and semantic search</title>
		<link>http://www.fugaz.net/2009/11/12/semantic-web-google-and-semantic-search/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fugaz.net/2009/11/12/semantic-web-google-and-semantic-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><span property="dc:creator" resource="http://www.fugaz.net/2009/11/12/semantic-web-google-and-semantic-search/">fugaz</span></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkedin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Data Tables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semantic web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w3c]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fugaz.net/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The W3C’s web of data model is still not on [Google's] radar&#8221;, as we can read in Google VP words. This approach makes perfectly sense. Everything doesn&#8217;t have to be represented semantically nor should. I am a big fan of the web of data (whatever this means) but I feel there is too much hype [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The W3C’s <em>web of data</em> model is still not on [Google's] radar&#8221;, as <a href="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2009/11/11/google-vp-on-semantic-search-and-the-semantic-web/">we can read </a>in <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/181874/google_vp_mayer_describes_the_perfect_search_engine.html">Google VP words</a>.</p>
<p>This approach makes perfectly sense. Everything doesn&#8217;t have to be represented semantically nor should.<span id="more-194"></span></p>
<p>I am a big fan of the web of data (whatever this means) but I feel there is too much hype about the web 3.0 and the ubiquitous semantic technologies.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s make a deal, and go focus on <a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/03/big-data-technologies-report.html">big data</a> for now (or a large set of structured, interesting data, such as RDF <a href="http://www.datatables.org/">Open Data Tables</a>) and see what happens with that.</p>
<p>For me the web of language can wait.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/611c1e62-de45-4da0-bd65-234c08bc6743/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=611c1e62-de45-4da0-bd65-234c08bc6743" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fugaz.net/2009/11/12/semantic-web-google-and-semantic-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

